NETWORK WORKING GROUP                                            B. Tung
Internet-Draft                        USC Information Sciences Institute
Expires: November 24, 2005                                        L. Zhu
                                                   Microsoft Corporation
                                                            May 23, 2005


     Public Key Cryptography for Initial Authentication in Kerberos
                    draft-ietf-cat-kerberos-pk-init

Status of this Memo

   This document is an Internet-Draft and is subject to all provisions
   of Section 3 of RFC 3667.  
   
   By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any 
   applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware 
   have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes 
   aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79. 
     
   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

   This Internet-Draft will expire on November 24, 2005.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).

Abstract

   This document describes protocol extensions (hereafter called PKINIT)
   to the Kerberos protocol specification.  These extensions provide a
   method for integrating public key cryptography into the initial
   authentication exchange, by using asymmetric-key signature and/or
   encryption algorithms in pre-authentication data fields.



Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005               [Page 1]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   2.  Conventions Used in This Document  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   3.  Extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
     3.1   Definitions, Requirements, and Constants . . . . . . . . .  4
       3.1.1   Required Algorithms  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
       3.1.2   Defined Message and Encryption Types . . . . . . . . .  5
       3.1.3   Algorithm Identifiers  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
     3.2   PKINIT Pre-authentication Syntax and Use . . . . . . . . .  7
       3.2.1   Generation of Client Request . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
       3.2.2   Receipt of Client Request  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
       3.2.3   Generation of KDC Reply  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
       3.2.4   Receipt of KDC Reply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
     3.3   Interoperability Requirements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
     3.4   KDC Indication of PKINIT Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
   4.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
   5.  Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
   6.  IANA Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
   7.  References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
     7.1   Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
     7.2   Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
       Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
   A.  PKINIT ASN.1 Module  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
       Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . 30


























Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005               [Page 2]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


1.  Introduction

   A client typically authenticates itself to a service in Kerberos
   using three distinct though related exchanges.  First, the client
   requests a ticket-granting ticket (TGT) from the Kerberos
   authentication server (AS).  Then, it uses the TGT to request a
   service ticket from the Kerberos ticket-granting server (TGS).
   Usually, the AS and TGS are integrated in a single device known as a
   Kerberos Key Distribution Center, or KDC.  Finally, the client uses
   the service ticket to authenticate itself to the service.

   The advantage afforded by the TGT is that the client exposes his
   long-term secrets only once.  The TGT and its associated session key
   can then be used for any subsequent service ticket requests.  One
   result of this is that all further authentication is independent of
   the method by which the initial authentication was performed.
   Consequently, initial authentication provides a convenient place to
   integrate public-key cryptography into Kerberos authentication.

   As defined in [CLAR], Kerberos authentication exchanges use
   symmetric-key cryptography, in part for performance.  One
   disadvantage of using symmetric-key cryptography is that the keys
   must be shared, so that before a client can authenticate itself, he
   must already be registered with the KDC.

   Conversely, public-key cryptography (in conjunction with an
   established Public Key Infrastructure) permits authentication without
   prior registration with a KDC.  Adding it to Kerberos allows the
   widespread use of Kerberized applications by clients without
   requiring them to register first with a KDC--a requirement that has
   no inherent security benefit.

   As noted above, a convenient and efficient place to introduce public-
   key cryptography into Kerberos is in the initial authentication
   exchange.  This document describes the methods and data formats for
   integrating public-key cryptography into Kerberos initial
   authentication.

2.  Conventions Used in This Document

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

   Both the AS and the TGS are referred to as the KDC.

   In this document, the encryption key used to encrypt the enc-part
   field of the KDC-REP in the AS-REP [CLAR] is referred to as the AS



Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005               [Page 3]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


   reply key.

3.  Extensions

   This section describes extensions to [CLAR] for supporting the use of
   public-key cryptography in the initial request for a ticket.

   Briefly, this document defines the following extensions to [CLAR]:

   1. The client indicates the use of public-key authentication by
      including a special preauthenticator in the initial request.  This
      preauthenticator contains the client's public-key data and a
      signature.

   2. The KDC tests the client's request against its authentication
      policy and trusted Certification Authorities (CAs).

   3. If the request passes the verification tests, the KDC replies as
      usual, but the reply is encrypted using either:

      a. a key generated through a Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange
         [RFC2631] [IEEE1363] with the client, signed using the KDC's
         signature key; or

      b. a symmetric encryption key, signed using the KDC's signature
         key and encrypted using the client's public key.

      Any keying material required by the client to obtain the
      encryption key for decrypting the KDC reply is returned in a pre-
      authentication field accompanying the usual reply.

   4. The client validates the KDC's signature, obtains the encryption
      key, decrypts the reply, and then proceeds as usual.

   Section 3.1 of this document enumerates the required algorithms and
   necessary extension message types.  Section 3.2 describes the
   extension messages in greater detail.

3.1  Definitions, Requirements, and Constants

3.1.1  Required Algorithms

   All PKINIT implementations MUST support the following algorithms:

   o  AS reply key enctype: AES256-CTS-HMAC-SHA1-96 etype [RFC3962].






Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005               [Page 4]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


   o  Signature algorithm: sha-1WithRSAEncryption [RFC3279].

   o  AS reply key delivery method: Diffie-Hellman key exchange
      [RFC2631].


3.1.2  Defined Message and Encryption Types

   PKINIT makes use of the following new pre-authentication types:

       PA_PK_AS_REQ                                 16
       PA_PK_AS_REP                                 17

   PKINIT also makes use of the following new authorization data type:

       AD_INITIAL_VERIFIED_CAS                       9

   PKINIT introduces the following new error codes:

       KDC_ERR_CLIENT_NOT_TRUSTED                   62
       KDC_ERR_INVALID_SIG                          64
       KDC_ERR_DH_KEY_PARAMETERS_NOT_ACCEPTED       65
       KDC_ERR_CANT_VERIFY_CERTIFICATE              70
       KDC_ERR_INVALID_CERTIFICATE                  71
       KDC_ERR_REVOKED_CERTIFICATE                  72
       KDC_ERR_REVOCATION_STATUS_UNKNOWN            73
       KDC_ERR_CLIENT_NAME_MISMATCH                 75
       KDC_ERR_INCONSISTENT_KEY_PURPOSE             76

   PKINIT uses the following typed data types for errors:

       TD_TRUSTED_CERTIFIERS                       104
       TD_INVALID_CERTIFICATES                     105
       TD_DH_PARAMETERS                            109

   PKINIT defines the following encryption types, for use in the AS-REQ
   message to indicate acceptance of the corresponding algorithms that
   can used by Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) [RFC3852] messages in
   the reply:

       dsaWithSHA1-CmsOID                            9
       md5WithRSAEncryption-CmsOID                  10
       sha1WithRSAEncryption-CmsOID                 11
       rc2CBC-EnvOID                                12
       rsaEncryption-EnvOID   (PKCS1 v1.5)          13
       rsaES-OAEP-EnvOID      (PKCS1 v2.0)          14
       des-ede3-cbc-EnvOID                          15




Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005               [Page 5]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


   The ASN.1 module for all structures defined in this document (plus
   IMPORT statements for all imported structures) is given in
   Appendix A.

   All structures defined in or imported into this document MUST be
   encoded using Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER) [X690] (unless
   otherwise noted).  All data structures carried in OCTET STRINGs must
   be encoded according to the rules specified in corresponding
   specifications.

   Interoperability note: Some implementations may not be able to decode
   wrapped CMS objects encoded with BER but not DER; specifically, they
   may not be able to decode infinite length encodings.  To maximize
   interoperability, implementers SHOULD encode CMS objects used in
   PKINIT with DER.

3.1.3  Algorithm Identifiers

   PKINIT does not define, but does make use of, the following algorithm
   identifiers.

   PKINIT uses the following algorithm identifiers for Diffie-Hellman
   key agreement [RFC3279]:

       dhpublicnumber (Modular Exponential Diffie-Hellman [RFC2631])
       id-ecPublicKey (Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman [IEEE1363])

   PKINIT uses the following signature algorithm identifiers [RFC3279]:

       sha-1WithRSAEncryption (RSA with SHA1)
       md5WithRSAEncryption   (RSA with MD5)
       id-dsa-with-sha1       (DSA with SHA1)

   PKINIT uses the following encryption algorithm identifiers [RFC3447]
   for encrypting the temporary key with a public key:

       rsaEncryption          (PKCS1 v1.5)
       id-RSAES-OAEP          (PKCS1 v2.0)

   PKINIT uses the following algorithm identifiers [RFC3370] [RFC3565]
   for encrypting the AS reply key with the temporary key:

       des-ede3-cbc           (three-key 3DES, CBC mode)
       rc2-cbc                (RC2, CBC mode)
       id-aes256-CBC          (AES-256, CBC mode)






Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005               [Page 6]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


3.2  PKINIT Pre-authentication Syntax and Use

   This section defines the syntax and use of the various pre-
   authentication fields employed by PKINIT.

3.2.1  Generation of Client Request

   The initial authentication request (AS-REQ) is sent as per [CLAR]; in
   addition, a pre-authentication data element, whose padata-type is
   PA_PK_AS_REQ and whose padata-value contains the DER encoding of the
   type PA-PK-AS-REQ, is included.

       PA-PK-AS-REQ ::= SEQUENCE {
          signedAuthPack          [0] IMPLICIT OCTET STRING,
                   -- Contains a CMS type ContentInfo encoded
                   -- according to [RFC3852].
                   -- The contentType field of the type ContentInfo
                   -- is id-signedData (1.2.840.113549.1.7.2),
                   -- and the content field is a SignedData.
                   -- The eContentType field for the type SignedData is
                   -- id-pkauthdata (1.3.6.1.5.2.3.1), and the
                   -- eContent field contains the DER encoding of the
                   -- type AuthPack.
                   -- AuthPack is defined below.
          trustedCertifiers       [1] SEQUENCE OF TrustedCA OPTIONAL,
                   -- A list of CAs, trusted by the client, that can
                   -- be used to certify the KDC.
                   -- Each TrustedCA identifies a CA or a CA
                   -- certificate (thereby its public key).
                   -- The information contained in the
                   -- trustedCertifiers SHOULD be used by the KDC as
                   -- hints to guide its selection of an appropriate
                   -- certificate chain to return to the client.
          kdcPkId                 [2] IMPLICIT OCTET STRING
                                      OPTIONAL,
                   -- Contains a CMS type SignerIdentifier encoded
                   -- according to [RFC3852].
                   -- Identifies, if present, a particular KDC
                   -- public key that the client already has.
          ...
       }

       DHNonce ::= OCTET STRING

       TrustedCA ::= SEQUENCE {
          caName                  [0] IMPLICIT OCTET STRING,
                   -- Contains a PKIX type Name encoded according to
                   -- [RFC3280].



Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005               [Page 7]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


                   -- Identifies a CA by the CA's distinguished subject
                   -- name.
          certificateSerialNumber [1] INTEGER OPTIONAL,
                   -- Specifies the CA certificate's serial number.
                   -- The defintion of the certificate serial number
                   -- is taken from X.509 [X.509-97].
          subjectKeyIdentifier    [2] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL,
                   -- Identifies the CA's public key by a key
                   -- identifier.  When an X.509 certificate is
                   -- referenced, this key identifier matches the X.509
                   -- subjectKeyIdentifier extension value.  When other
                   -- certificate formats are referenced, the documents
                   -- that specify the certificate format and their use
                   -- with the CMS must include details on matching the
                   -- key identifier to the appropriate certificate
                   -- field.
          ...
       }

       AuthPack ::= SEQUENCE {
          pkAuthenticator         [0] PKAuthenticator,
          clientPublicValue       [1] SubjectPublicKeyInfo OPTIONAL,
                   -- Type SubjectPublicKeyInfo is defined in
                   -- [RFC3280].
                   -- Specifies Diffie-Hellman domain parameters
                   -- and the client's public key value [IEEE1363].
                   -- The DH public key value is encoded as a BIT
                   -- STRING, as specified in Section 2.3.3 of
                   -- [RFC3279].
                   -- This field is present only if the client wishes
                   -- to use the Diffie-Hellman key agreement method.
          supportedCMSTypes       [2] SEQUENCE OF AlgorithmIdentifier
                                      OPTIONAL,
                   -- Type AlgorithmIdentifier is defined in
                   -- [RFC3280].
                   -- List of CMS encryption types supported by the
                   -- client in order of (decreasing) preference.
          clientDHNonce           [3] DHNonce OPTIONAL,
                   -- Present only if the client indicates that it
                   -- wishes to reuse DH keys or to allow the KDC to
                   -- do so (see Section 3.2.3.1).
          ...
       }

       PKAuthenticator ::= SEQUENCE {
          cusec                   [0] INTEGER (0..999999),
          ctime                   [1] KerberosTime,
                   -- cusec and ctime are used as in [CLAR], for replay



Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005               [Page 8]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


                   -- prevention.
          nonce                   [2] INTEGER (0..4294967295),
                   -- Chosen randomly;  This nonce does not need to
                   -- match with the nonce in the KDC-REQ-BODY.
          paChecksum              [3] OCTET STRING,
                   -- Contains the SHA1 checksum, performed over
                   -- KDC-REQ-BODY.
          ...
       }

   The ContentInfo [RFC3852] structure for the signedAuthPack field is
   filled out as follows:

   1.  The contentType field of the type ContentInfo is id-signedData
       (as defined in [RFC3852]), and the content field is a SignedData
       (as defined in [RFC3852]).

   2.  The eContentType field for the type SignedData is id-pkauthdata:
       { iso(1) org(3) dod(6) internet(1) security(5) kerberosv5(2)
       pkinit(3) pkauthdata(1) }.

   3.  The eContent field for the type SignedData contains the DER
       encoding of the type AuthPack.

   4.  The signerInfos field of the type SignedData contains a single
       signerInfo, which contains the signature over the type AuthPack.

   5.  The certificates field of the type SignedData contains
       certificates intended to facilitate certification path
       construction, so that the KDC can verify the signature over the
       type AuthPack.  For path validation, these certificates SHOULD be
       sufficient to construct at least one certification path from the
       client certificate to one trust anchor acceptable by the KDC
       [CAPATH].  The client MUST be capable of including such a set of
       certificates if configured to do so.  The certificates field MUST
       NOT contain "root" CA certificates.

   6.  The client's Diffie-Hellman public value (clientPublicValue) is
       included if and only if the client wishes to use the Diffie-
       Hellman key agreement method.  The Diffie-Hellman domain
       parameters [IEEE1363] for the client's public key are specified
       in the algorithm field of the type SubjectPublicKeyInfo [RFC3279]
       and the client's Diffie-Hellman public key value is mapped to a
       subjectPublicKey (a BIT STRING) according to [RFC3279].  When
       using the Diffie-Hellman key agreement method, implementations
       MUST support Oakley 1024-bit Modular Exponential (MODP) well-
       known group 2 [RFC2412] and SHOULD support Oakley 2048-bit MODP
       well-known group 14 and Oakley 4096-bit MODP well-known group 16



Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005               [Page 9]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


       [RFC3526].

       The Diffie-Hellman field size should be chosen so as to provide
       sufficient cryptographic security [RFC3766].

       When MODP Diffie-Hellman is used, the exponents should have at
       least twice as many bits as the symmetric keys that will be
       derived from them [ODL99].

   7.  The client may wish to reuse DH keys or to allow the KDC to do so
       (see Section 3.2.3.1).  If so, then the client includes the
       clientDHNonce field.  This nonce string needs to be as long as
       the longest key length of the symmetric key types that the client
       supports.  This nonce MUST be chosen randomly.


3.2.2  Receipt of Client Request

   Upon receiving the client's request, the KDC validates it.  This
   section describes the steps that the KDC MUST (unless otherwise
   noted) take in validating the request.

   The KDC verifies the client's signature in the signedAuthPack field
   according to [RFC3852].

   If, while validating the client's X.509 certificate [RFC3280], the
   KDC cannot build a certification path to validate the client's
   certificate, it sends back a KRB-ERROR [CLAR] message with the code
   KDC_ERR_CANT_VERIFY_CERTIFICATE.  The accompanying e-data for this
   error message is a TYPED-DATA (as defined in [CLAR]) that contains an
   element whose data-type is TD_TRUSTED_CERTIFIERS, and whose data-
   value contains the DER encoding of the type TD-TRUSTED-CERTIFIERS:

       TD-TRUSTED-CERTIFIERS ::= SEQUENCE OF TrustedCA
                   -- Identifies a list of CAs trusted by the KDC.
                   -- Each TrustedCA identifies a CA or a CA
                   -- certificate (thereby its public key).

   Upon receiving this error message, the client SHOULD retry only if it
   has a different set of certificates (from those of the previous
   requests) that form a certification path (or a partial path) from one
   of the trust anchors acceptable by the KDC to its own certificate.

   If, while processing the certification path, the KDC determines that
   the signature on one of the certificates in the signedAuthPack field
   is invalid, it returns a KRB-ERROR [CLAR] message with the code
   KDC_ERR_INVALID_CERTIFICATE.  The accompanying e-data for this error
   message is a TYPED-DATA that contains an element whose data-type is



Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005              [Page 10]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


   TD_INVALID_CERTIFICATES, and whose data-value contains the DER
   encoding of the type TD-INVALID-CERTIFICATES:

       TD-INVALID-CERTIFICATES ::= SEQUENCE OF OCTET STRING
                   -- Each OCTET STRING contains a CMS type
                   -- IssuerAndSerialNumber encoded according to
                   -- [RFC3852].
                   -- Each IssuerAndSerialNumber identifies a
                   -- certificate (sent by the client) with an invalid
                   -- signature.

   If more than one X.509 certificate signature is invalid, the KDC MAY
   include one IssuerAndSerialNumber per invalid signature within the
   TD-INVALID-CERTIFICATES.

   The client's X.509 certificate is validated according to [RFC3280].

   Based on local policy, the KDC may also check whether any X.509
   certificates in the certification path validating the client's
   certificate have been revoked.  If any of them have been revoked, the
   KDC MUST return an error message with the code
   KDC_ERR_REVOKED_CERTIFICATE; if the KDC attempts to determine the
   revocation status but is unable to do so, it SHOULD return an error
   message with the code KDC_ERR_REVOCATION_STATUS_UNKNOWN.  The
   certificate or certificates affected are identified exactly as for
   the error code KDC_ERR_INVALID_CERTIFICATE (see above).

   Note that the TD_INVALID_CERTIFICATES error data is only used to
   identify invalid certificates sent by the client in the request.

   The client's public key is then used to verify the signature.  If the
   signature fails to verify, the KDC MUST return an error message with
   the code KDC_ERR_INVALID_SIG.  There is no accompanying e-data for
   this error message.

   In addition to validating the client's signature, the KDC MUST also
   check that the client's public key used to verify the client's
   signature is bound to the client's principal name as specified in the
   AS-REQ as follows:

   1. If the KDC has its own binding between either the client's
      signature-verification public key or the client's certificate and
      the client's Kerberos principal name, it uses that binding.








Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005              [Page 11]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


   2. Otherwise, if the client's X.509 certificate contains a Subject
      Alternative Name (SAN) extension carrying a KRB5PrincipalName
      (defined below) in the otherName field of the type GeneralName
      [RFC3280], it binds the client's X.509 certificate to that name.

      The type of the otherName field is AnotherName.  The type-id field
      of the type AnotherName is id-pksan:

       id-pksan OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
         { iso(1) org(3) dod(6) internet(1) security(5) kerberosv5(2)
           x509-sanan (2) }

      And the value field of the type AnotherName is a
      KRB5PrincipalName.

       KRB5PrincipalName ::= SEQUENCE {
           realm                   [0] Realm,
           principalName           [1] PrincipalName
       }

   If the KDC does not have its own binding and there is no
   KRB5PrincipalName name present in the client's X.509 certificate, or
   if the Kerberos name in the request does not match the
   KRB5PrincipalName in the client's X.509 certificate (including the
   realm name), the KDC MUST return an error message with the code
   KDC_ERR_CLIENT_NAME_MISMATCH.  There is no accompanying e-data for
   this error message.

   The KDC MAY require the presence of an Extended Key Usage (EKU)
   KeyPurposeId [RFC3280] id-pkekuoid in the extensions field of the
   client's X.509 certificate:

       id-pkekuoid OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
         { iso(1) org(3) dod(6) internet(1) security(5) kerberosv5(2)
           pkinit(3) pkekuoid(4) }
              -- PKINIT client authentication.
              -- Key usage bits that MUST be consistent:
              -- digitalSignature.

   If this EKU KeyPurposeId is required but it is not present or if the
   client certificate is restricted not to be used for PKINIT client
   authentication per Section 4.2.1.13 of [RFC3280], the KDC MUST return
   an error message of the code KDC_ERR_INCONSISTENT_KEY_PURPOSE.  There
   is no accompanying e-data for this error message.  KDCs implementing
   this requirement SHOULD also accept the EKU KeyPurposeId id-ms-sc-
   logon (1.3.6.1.4.1.311.20.2.2) as meeting the requirement, as there
   are a large number of X.509 client certificates deployed for use with
   PKINIT which have this EKU.



Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005              [Page 12]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


   If for any other reasons, the client's public key is not accepted,
   the KDC MUST return an error message with the code
   KDC_ERR_CLIENT_NOT_TRUSTED.

   The KDC MUST check the timestamp to ensure that the request is not a
   replay, and that the time skew falls within acceptable limits.  The
   recommendations for clock skew times in [CLAR] apply here.  If the
   check fails, the KDC MUST return error code KRB_AP_ERR_REPEAT or
   KRB_AP_ERR_SKEW, respectively.

   If the clientPublicValue is filled in, indicating that the client
   wishes to use the Diffie-Hellman key agreement method, the KDC SHOULD
   check to see if the key parameters satisfy its policy.  If they do
   not, it MUST return an error message with the code
   KDC_ERR_DH_KEY_PARAMETERS_NOT_ACCEPTED.  The accompanying e-data is a
   TYPED-DATA that contains an element whose data-type is
   TD_DH_PARAMETERS, and whose data-value contains the DER encoding of
   the type TD-DH-PARAMETERS:

       TD-DH-PARAMETERS ::= SEQUENCE OF AlgorithmIdentifier
                   -- Each AlgorithmIdentifier specifies a set of
                   -- Diffie-Hellman domain parameters [IEEE1363].
                   -- This list is in decreasing preference order.

   TD-DH-PARAMETERS contains a list of Diffie-Hellman domain parameters
   that the KDC supports in decreasing preference order, from which the
   client SHOULD pick one to retry the request.

   If the client included a kdcPkId field in the PA-PK-AS-REQ and the
   KDC does not possess the corresponding key, the KDC MUST ignore the
   kdcPkId field as if the client did not include one.

   If there is a supportedCMSTypes field in the AuthPack, the KDC must
   check to see if it supports any of the listed types.  If it supports
   more than one of the types, the KDC SHOULD use the one listed first.
   If it does not support any of them, it MUST return an error message
   with the code KDC_ERR_ETYPE_NOSUPP [CLAR].

3.2.3  Generation of KDC Reply

   Assuming that the client's request has been properly validated, the
   KDC proceeds as per [CLAR], except as follows.

   The KDC MUST set the initial flag and include an authorization data
   element of ad-type [CLAR] AD_INITIAL_VERIFIED_CAS in the issued
   ticket.  The ad-data [CLAR] field contains the DER encoding of the
   type AD-INITIAL-VERIFIED-CAS:




Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005              [Page 13]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


       AD-INITIAL-VERIFIED-CAS ::= SEQUENCE OF TrustedCA
                   -- Identifies the certification path based on which
                   -- the client certificate was validated.
                   -- Each TrustedCA identifies a CA or a CA
                   -- certificate (thereby its public key).

   The AS wraps any AD-INITIAL-VERIFIED-CAS data in AD-IF-RELEVANT
   containers if the list of CAs satisfies the AS' realm's local policy
   (this corresponds to the TRANSITED-POLICY-CHECKED ticket flag
   [CLAR]).  Furthermore, any TGS MUST copy such authorization data from
   tickets used within a PA-TGS-REQ of the TGS-REQ into the resulting
   ticket.  If the list of CAs satisfies the local KDC's realm's policy,
   the TGS MAY wrap the data into the AD-IF-RELEVANT container,
   otherwise it MAY unwrap the authorization data out of the AD-IF-
   RELEVANT container.

   Application servers that understand this authorization data type
   SHOULD apply local policy to determine whether a given ticket bearing
   such a type *not* contained within an AD-IF-RELEVANT container is
   acceptable.  (This corresponds to the AP server checking the
   transited field when the TRANSITED-POLICY-CHECKED flag has not been
   set [CLAR].)  If such a data type is contained within an AD-IF-
   RELEVANT container, AP servers MAY apply local policy to determine
   whether the authorization data is acceptable.

   The content of the AS-REP is otherwise unchanged from [CLAR].  The
   KDC encrypts the reply as usual, but not with the client's long-term
   key.  Instead, it encrypts it with either a shared key derived from a
   Diffie-Hellman exchange, or a generated encryption key.  The contents
   of the PA-PK-AS-REP indicate which key delivery method is used:

       PA-PK-AS-REP ::= CHOICE {
          dhInfo                  [0] DHRepInfo,
                   -- Selected when Diffie-Hellman key exchange is
                   -- used.
          encKeyPack              [1] IMPLICIT OCTET STRING,
                   -- Selected when public key encryption is used.
                   -- Contains a CMS type ContentInfo encoded
                   -- according to [RFC3852].
                   -- The contentType field of the type ContentInfo is
                   -- id-envelopedData (1.2.840.113549.1.7.3).
                   -- The content field is an EnvelopedData.
                   -- The contentType field for the type EnvelopedData
                   -- is id-signedData (1.2.840.113549.1.7.2).
                   -- The eContentType field for the inner type
                   -- SignedData (when unencrypted) is id-pkrkeydata
                   -- (1.2.840.113549.1.7.3) and the eContent field
                   -- contains the DER encoding of the type



Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005              [Page 14]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


                   -- ReplyKeyPack.
                   -- ReplyKeyPack is defined in Section 3.2.3.2.
          ...
       }

       DHRepInfo ::= SEQUENCE {
          dhSignedData            [0] IMPLICIT OCTET STRING,
                   -- Contains a CMS type ContentInfo encoded according
                   -- to [RFC3852].
                   -- The contentType field of the type ContentInfo is
                   -- id-signedData (1.2.840.113549.1.7.2), and the
                   -- content field is a SignedData.
                   -- The eContentType field for the type SignedData is
                   -- id-pkdhkeydata (1.3.6.1.5.2.3.2), and the
                   -- eContent field contains the DER encoding of the
                   -- type KDCDHKeyInfo.
                   -- KDCDHKeyInfo is defined below.
          serverDHNonce           [1] DHNonce OPTIONAL
                   -- Present if and only if dhKeyExpiration is
                   -- present in the KDCDHKeyInfo.
       }

       KDCDHKeyInfo ::= SEQUENCE {
          subjectPublicKey        [0] BIT STRING,
                   -- KDC's DH public key.
                   -- The DH public key value is encoded as a BIT
                   -- STRING, as specified in Section 2.3.3 of
                   -- [RFC3279].
          nonce                   [1] INTEGER (0..4294967295),
                   -- Contains the nonce in the PKAuthenticator of the
                   -- request if DH keys are NOT reused,
                   -- 0 otherwise.
          dhKeyExpiration         [2] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
                   -- Expiration time for KDC's key pair,
                   -- present if and only if DH keys are reused. If
                   -- this field is omitted then the serverDHNonce
                   -- field MUST also be omitted. See Section 3.2.3.1.
          ...
       }


3.2.3.1  Using Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange

   In this case, the PA-PK-AS-REP contains a DHRepInfo structure.

   The ContentInfo [RFC3852] structure for the dhSignedData field is
   filled in as follows:




Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005              [Page 15]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


   1.  The contentType field of the type ContentInfo is id-signedData
       (as defined in [RFC3852]), and the content field is a SignedData
       (as defined in [RFC3852]).

   2.  The eContentType field for the type SignedData is the OID value
       for id-pkdhkeydata: { iso(1) org(3) dod(6) internet(1)
       security(5) kerberosv5(2) pkinit(3) pkdhkeydata(2) }.

   3.  The eContent field for the type SignedData contains the DER
       encoding of the type KDCDHKeyInfo.

   4.  The signerInfos field of the type SignedData contains a single
       signerInfo, which contains the signature over the type
       KDCDHKeyInfo.

   5.  The certificates field of the type SignedData contains
       certificates intended to facilitate certification path
       construction, so that the client can verify the KDC's signature
       over the type KDCDHKeyInfo.  The information contained in the
       trustedCertifiers in the request SHOULD be used by the KDC as
       hints to guide its selection of an appropriate certificate chain
       to return to the client.  This field may only. be left empty if
       the KDC public key specified by the kdcPkId field in the PA-PK-
       AS-REQ was used for signing.  Otherwise, for path validation,
       these certificates SHOULD be sufficient to construct at least one
       certification path from the KDC certificate to one trust anchor
       acceptable by the client [CAPATH].  The KDC MUST be capable of
       including such a set of certificates if configured to do so.  The
       certificates field MUST NOT contain "root" CA certificates.

   6.  If the client included the clientDHNonce field, then the KDC may
       choose to reuse its DH keys (see Section 3.2.3.1).  If the server
       reuses DH keys then it MUST include an expiration time in the
       dhKeyExpiration field.  Past the point of the expiration time,
       the signature over the type DHRepInfo is considered expired/
       invalid.  When the server reuses DH keys then it MUST include a
       serverDHNonce at least as long as the length of keys for the
       symmetric encryption system used to encrypt the AS reply.  Note
       that including the serverDHNonce changes how the client and
       server calculate the key to use to encrypt the reply; see below
       for details.  The KDC SHOULD NOT reuse DH keys unless the
       clientDHNonce field is present in the request.

   The AS reply key is derived as follows:







Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005              [Page 16]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


   1. Both the KDC and the client calculate the shared secret value as
      follows:

      a) When MODP Diffie-Hellman is used, let DHSharedSecret be the
         shared secret value.  DHSharedSecret is the value ZZ as
         described in Section 2.1.1 of [RFC2631].

      b) When Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) (with each party
         contributing one key pair) is used, let DHSharedSecret be the
         x-coordinate of the shared secret value (an elliptic curve
         point).  DHSharedSecret is the output of operation ECSVDP-DH as
         described in Section 7.2.1 of [IEEE1363].

      DHSharedSecret is first padded with leading zeros such that the
      size of DHSharedSecret in octets is the same as that of the
      modulus, then represented as a string of octets in big-endian
      order.

      Implementation note: Both the client and the KDC can cache the
      triple (ya, yb, DHSharedSecret), where ya is the client's public
      key and yb is the KDC's public key.  If both ya and yb are the
      same in a later exchange, the cached DHSharedSecret can be used.

   2. Let K be the key-generation seed length [RFC3961] of the AS reply
      key whose enctype is selected according to [CLAR].

   3. Define the function octetstring2key() as follows:

           octetstring2key(x) == random-to-key(K-truncate(
                                    SHA1(0x00 | x) |
                                    SHA1(0x01 | x) |
                                    SHA1(0x02 | x) |
                                    ...
                                    ))

      where x is an octet string; | is the concatenation operator; 0x00,
      0x01, 0x02, etc., are each represented as a single octet; random-
      to-key() is an operation that generates a protocol key from a
      bitstring of length K; and K-truncate truncates its input to the
      first K bits.  Both K and random-to-key() are as defined in the
      kcrypto profile [RFC3961] for the enctype of the AS reply key.

   4. When DH keys are reused, let n_c be the clientDHNonce, and n_k be
      the serverDHNonce; otherwise, let both n_c and n_k be empty octet
      strings.






Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005              [Page 17]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


   5. The AS reply key k is:

           k = octetstring2key(DHSharedSecret | n_c | n_k)


3.2.3.2  Using Public Key Encryption

   In this case, the PA-PK-AS-REP contains a ContentInfo structure
   wrapped in an OCTET STRING.  The AS reply key is encrypted in the
   encKeyPack field, which contains data of type ReplyKeyPack:

       ReplyKeyPack ::= SEQUENCE {
          replyKey                [0] EncryptionKey,
                   -- Contains the session key used to encrypt the
                   -- enc-part field in the AS-REP.
          nonce                   [1] INTEGER (0..4294967295),
                   -- Contains the nonce in the PKAuthenticator of the
                   -- request.
          ...
       }

   The ContentInfo [RFC3852] structure for the encKeyPack field is
   filled in as follows:

   1.  The contentType field of the type ContentInfo is id-envelopedData
       (as defined in [RFC3852]), and the content field is an
       EnvelopedData (as defined in [RFC3852]).

   2.  The contentType field for the type EnvelopedData is id-
       signedData: { iso (1) member-body (2) us (840) rsadsi (113549)
       pkcs (1) pkcs7 (7) signedData (2) }.

   3.  The eContentType field for the inner type SignedData (when
       decrypted from the encryptedContent field for the type
       EnvelopedData) is id-pkrkeydata: { iso(1) org(3) dod(6)
       internet(1) security(5) kerberosv5(2) pkinit(3) pkrkeydata(3) }.

   4.  The eContent field for the inner type SignedData contains the DER
       encoding of the type ReplyKeyPack.

   5.  The signerInfos field of the inner type SignedData contains a
       single signerInfo, which contains the signature over the type
       ReplyKeyPack.

   6.  The certificates field of the inner type SignedData contains
       certificates intended to facilitate certification path
       construction, so that the client can verify the KDC's signature
       over the type ReplyKeyPack.  The information contained in the



Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005              [Page 18]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


       trustedCertifiers in the request SHOULD be used by the KDC as
       hints to guide its selection of an appropriate certificate chain
       to return to the client.  This field may only be left empty if
       the KDC public key specified by the kdcPkId field in the PA-PK-
       AS-REQ was used for signing.  Otherwise, for path validation,
       these certificates SHOULD be sufficient to construct at least one
       certification path from the KDC certificate to one trust anchor
       acceptable by the client [CAPATH].  The KDC MUST be capable of
       including such a set of certificates if configured to do so.  The
       certificates field MUST NOT contain "root" CA certificates.

   7.  The recipientInfos field of the type EnvelopedData is a SET which
       MUST contain exactly one member of type KeyTransRecipientInfo.
       The encryptedKey of this member contains the temporary key which
       is encrypted using the client's public key.

   8.  The unprotectedAttrs or originatorInfo fields of the type
       EnvelopedData MAY be present.

3.2.4  Receipt of KDC Reply

   Upon receipt of the KDC's reply, the client proceeds as follows.  If
   the PA-PK-AS-REP contains the dhSignedData field, the client derives
   the AS reply key using the same procedure used by the KDC as defined
   in Section 3.2.3.1.  Otherwise, the message contains the encKeyPack
   field, and the client decrypts and extracts the temporary key in the
   encryptedKey field of the member KeyTransRecipientInfo, and then uses
   that as the AS reply key.

   In either case, the client MUST verify the signature in the
   SignedData according to [RFC3852].  The KDC's X.509 certificate MUST
   be validated according to [RFC3280].  In addition, unless the client
   can otherwise verify that the public key used to verify the KDC's
   signature is bound to the KDC of the target realm, the KDC's X.509
   certificate MUST contain a Subject Alternative Name extension
   [RFC3280] carrying an AnotherName whose type-id is id-pksan (as
   defined in Section 3.2.2) and whose value is a KRB5PrincipalName that
   matches the name of the TGS of the target realm (as defined in
   Section 7.3 of [CLAR]).

   Based on local policy, the client MAY require that the KDC
   certificate contains the EKU KeyPurposeId [RFC3280] id-pkkdcekuoid:

       id-pkkdcekuoid OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
         { iso(1) org(3) dod(6) internet(1) security(5) kerberosv5(2)
           pkinit(3) pkkdcekuoid(5) }
              -- Signing KDC responses.
              -- Key usage bits that MUST be consistent:



Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005              [Page 19]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


              -- digitalSignature.

   If all applicable checks are satisfied, the client then decrypts the
   enc-part field of the KDC-REP in the AS-REP using the AS reply key,
   and then proceeds as described in [CLAR].

   Implementation note: CAs issuing KDC certificates SHOULD place all
   "short" and "fully-qualified" Kerberos realm names of the KDC (one
   per GeneralName [RFC3280]) into the KDC certificate to allow maximum
   flexibility.

3.3  Interoperability Requirements

   The client MUST be capable of sending a set of certificates
   sufficient to allow the KDC to construct a certification path for the
   client's certificate, if the correct set of certificates is provided
   through configuration or policy.

   If the client sends all the X.509 certificates on a certification
   path to a trust anchor acceptable by the KDC, and the KDC can not
   verify the client's public key otherwise, the KDC MUST be able to
   process path validation for the client's certificate based on the
   certificates in the request.

   The KDC MUST be capable of sending a set of certificates sufficient
   to allow the client to construct a certification path for the KDC's
   certificate, if the correct set of certificates is provided through
   configuration or policy.

   If the KDC sends all the X.509 certificates on a certification path
   to a trust anchor acceptable by the client, and the client can not
   verify the KDC's public key otherwise, the client MUST be able to
   process path validation for the KDC's certificate based on the
   certificates in the reply.

3.4  KDC Indication of PKINIT Support

   If pre-authentication is required, but was not present in the
   request, per [CLAR] an error message with the code
   KDC_ERR_PREAUTH_FAILED is returned and a METHOD-DATA object will be
   stored in the e-data field of the KRB-ERROR message to specify which
   pre-authentication mechanisms are acceptable.  The KDC can then
   indicate the support of PKINIT by including an empty element whose
   padata-type is PA_PK_AS_REQ in that METHOD-DATA object.

   Otherwise if it is required by the KDC's local policy that the client
   must be pre-authenticated using the pre-authentication mechanism
   specified in this document, but no PKINIT pre-authentication was



Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005              [Page 20]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


   present in the request, an error message with the code
   KDC_ERR_PREAUTH_FAILED SHOULD be returned.

   KDCs MUST leave the padata-value field of the PA_PK_AS_REQ element in
   the KRB-ERROR's METHOD-DATA empty (i.e., send a zero-length OCTET
   STRING), and clients MUST ignore this and any other value.  Future
   extensions to this protocol may specify other data to send instead of
   an empty OCTET STRING.

4.  Security Considerations

   PKINIT raises certain security considerations beyond those that can
   be regulated strictly in protocol definitions.  We will address them
   in this section.

   PKINIT extends the cross-realm model to the public-key
   infrastructure.  Users of PKINIT must understand security policies
   and procedures appropriate to the use of Public Key Infrastructures
   [RFC3280].

   Standard Kerberos allows the possibility of interactions between
   cryptosystems of varying strengths; this document adds interactions
   with public-key cryptosystems to Kerberos.  Some administrative
   policies may allow the use of relatively weak public keys.  Using
   such keys to wrap data encrypted under stronger conventional
   cryptosystems may be inappropriate.

   PKINIT requires keys for symmetric cryptosystems to be generated.
   Some such systems contain "weak" keys.  For recommendations regarding
   these weak keys, see [CLAR].

   PKINIT allows the use of the same RSA key pair for encryption and
   signing when doing RSA encryption based key delivery.  This is not
   recommended usage of RSA keys [RFC3447], by using DH based key
   delivery this is avoided.

   Care should be taken in how certificates are chosen for the purposes
   of authentication using PKINIT.  Some local policies may require that
   key escrow be used for certain certificate types.  Deployers of
   PKINIT should be aware of the implications of using certificates that
   have escrowed keys for the purposes of authentication.  Because
   signing only certificates are normally not escrowed, by using DH
   based key delivery this is avoided.

   PKINIT does not provide for a "return routability" test to prevent
   attackers from mounting a denial-of-service attack on the KDC by
   causing it to perform unnecessary and expensive public-key
   operations.  Strictly speaking, this is also true of standard



Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005              [Page 21]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


   Kerberos, although the potential cost is not as great, because
   standard Kerberos does not make use of public-key cryptography.  By
   using DH based key delivery and reusing DH keys, the necessary crypto
   processing cost per request can be minimized.

   The syntax for the AD-INITIAL-VERIFIED-CAS authorization data does
   permit empty SEQUENCEs to be encoded.  Such empty sequences may only
   be used if the KDC itself vouches for the user's certificate.

5.  Acknowledgements

   The following people have made significant contributions to this
   draft: Paul Leach, Kristin Lauter, Sam Hartman, Love Hornquist
   Astrand, Ken Raeburn, Nicolas Williams, John Wray, Jonathan Trostle,
   Tom Yu, Jeffrey Hutzelman, David Cross, Dan Simon, Karthik
   Jaganathan, Chaskiel M Grundman and Stefan Santesson.

   Special thanks to Clifford Neuman, Matthew Hur, Sasha Medvinsky and
   Jonathan Trostle who wrote earlier versions of this document.

   The authors are indebted to the Kerberos working group chair Jeffrey
   Hutzelman who kept track of various issues and was enormously helpful
   during the creation of this document.

   Some of the ideas on which this document is based arose during
   discussions over several years between members of the SAAG, the IETF
   CAT working group, and the PSRG, regarding integration of Kerberos
   and SPX.  Some ideas have also been drawn from the DASS system.
   These changes are by no means endorsed by these groups.  This is an
   attempt to revive some of the goals of those groups, and this
   document approaches those goals primarily from the Kerberos
   perspective.

   Lastly, comments from groups working on similar ideas in DCE have
   been invaluable.

6.  IANA Considerations

   This document has no actions for IANA.

7.  References

7.1  Normative References

   [CLAR]     RFC-Editor: To be replaced by RFC number for draft-ietf-
              krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications.  Work in Progress. 




Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005              [Page 22]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


   [IEEE1363] 
              IEEE, "Standard Specifications for Public Key 
              Cryptography", IEEE 1363, 2000.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC2412]  Orman, H., "The OAKLEY Key Determination Protocol",
              RFC 2412, November 1998.

   [RFC2631]  Rescorla, E., "Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Method",
              RFC 2631, June 1999.

   [RFC3279]  Bassham, L., Polk, W., and R. Housley, "Algorithms and
              Identifiers for the Internet X.509 Public Key
              Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List
              (CRL) Profile", RFC 3279, April 2002.

   [RFC3280]  Housley, R., Polk, W., Ford, W., and D. Solo, "Internet
              X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and
              Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile", RFC 3280,
              April 2002.

   [RFC3370]  Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
              Algorithms", RFC 3370, August 2002.

   [RFC3447]  Jonsson, J. and B. Kaliski, "Public-Key Cryptography
              Standards (PKCS) #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications
              Version 2.1", RFC 3447, February 2003.

   [RFC3526]  Kivinen, T. and M. Kojo, "More Modular Exponential (MODP)
              Diffie-Hellman groups for Internet Key Exchange (IKE)",
              RFC 3526, May 2003.

   [RFC3565]  Schaad, J., "Use of the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
              Encryption Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax
              (CMS)", RFC 3565, July 2003.

   [RFC3766]  Orman, H. and P. Hoffman, "Determining Strengths For
              Public Keys Used For Exchanging Symmetric Keys", BCP 86,
              RFC 3766, April 2004.

   [RFC3852]  Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)",
              RFC 3852, July 2004.

   [RFC3961]  Raeburn, K., "Encryption and Checksum Specifications for
              Kerberos 5", RFC 3961, February 2005.




Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005              [Page 23]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


   [RFC3962]  Raeburn, K., "Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
              Encryption for Kerberos 5", RFC 3962, February 2005.

   [X.509-97] ITU-T.  Recommendation X.509: The Directory - Authentication 
              Framework.  1997.

   [X690]     ASN.1 encoding rules: Specification of Basic Encoding  
              Rules (BER), Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and
              Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER), ITU-T Recommendation
              X.690 (1997) | ISO/IEC International Standard
              8825-1:1998.

7.2  Informative References

   [CAPATH]   RFC-Editor: To be replaced by RFC number for draft-ietf-
              pkix-certpathbuild.  Work in Progress. 

   [LENSTRA]  Lenstra, A. and E. Verheul, "Selecting Cryptographic Key 
              Sizes", Journal of Cryptology 14 (2001) 255-293.

   [ODL99]    Odlyzko, A., "Discrete logarithms: The past and the
              future, Designs, Codes, and Cryptography (1999)". 


Authors' Addresses

   Brian Tung
   USC Information Sciences Institute
   4676 Admiralty Way Suite 1001, Marina del Rey CA
   Marina del Rey, CA  90292
   US

   Email: brian@isi.edu


   Larry Zhu
   Microsoft Corporation
   One Microsoft Way
   Redmond, WA  98052
   US

   Email: lzhu@microsoft.com

Appendix A.  PKINIT ASN.1 Module



Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005              [Page 24]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


       KerberosV5-PK-INIT-SPEC {
               iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1)
               security(5) kerberosV5(2) modules(4) pkinit(5)
       } DEFINITIONS EXPLICIT TAGS ::= BEGIN

       IMPORTS
           SubjectPublicKeyInfo, AlgorithmIdentifier
               FROM PKIX1Explicit88 { iso (1)
                 identified-organization (3) dod (6) internet (1)
                 security (5) mechanisms (5) pkix (7) id-mod (0)
                 id-pkix1-explicit (18) }
                 -- As defined in RFC 3280.

           DomainParameters, EcpkParameters
               FROM PKIX1Algorithms88 { iso(1)
                 identified-organization(3) dod(6)
                 internet(1) security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0)
                 id-mod-pkix1-algorithms(17) }
                 -- As defined in RFC 3279.

           KerberosTime, TYPED-DATA, PrincipalName, Realm, EncryptionKey
               FROM KerberosV5Spec2 { iso(1) identified-organization(3)
                 dod(6) internet(1) security(5) kerberosV5(2)
                 modules(4) krb5spec2(2) } ;

       id-pkinit OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
         { iso (1) org (3) dod (6) internet (1) security (5)
           kerberosv5 (2) pkinit (3) }

       id-pkauthdata  OBJECT IDENTIFIER  ::= { id-pkinit 1 }
       id-pkdhkeydata OBJECT IDENTIFIER  ::= { id-pkinit 2 }
       id-pkrkeydata  OBJECT IDENTIFIER  ::= { id-pkinit 3 }
       id-pkekuoid    OBJECT IDENTIFIER  ::= { id-pkinit 4 }
       id-pkkdcekuoid OBJECT IDENTIFIER  ::= { id-pkinit 5 }

       pa-pk-as-req INTEGER ::=                  16
       pa-pk-as-rep INTEGER ::=                  17

       ad-initial-verified-cas INTEGER ::=        9

       td-trusted-certifiers INTEGER ::=        104
       td-invalid-certificates INTEGER ::=      105
       td-dh-parameters INTEGER ::=             109

       PA-PK-AS-REQ ::= SEQUENCE {
          signedAuthPack          [0] IMPLICIT OCTET STRING,
                   -- Contains a CMS type ContentInfo encoded
                   -- according to [RFC3852].



Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005              [Page 25]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


                   -- The contentType field of the type ContentInfo
                   -- is id-signedData (1.2.840.113549.1.7.2),
                   -- and the content field is a SignedData.
                   -- The eContentType field for the type SignedData is
                   -- id-pkauthdata (1.3.6.1.5.2.3.1), and the
                   -- eContent field contains the DER encoding of the
                   -- type AuthPack.
                   -- AuthPack is defined below.
          trustedCertifiers       [1] SEQUENCE OF TrustedCA OPTIONAL,
                   -- A list of CAs, trusted by the client, that can
                   -- be used to certify the KDC.
                   -- Each TrustedCA identifies a CA or a CA
                   -- certificate (thereby its public key).
                   -- The information contained in the
                   -- trustedCertifiers SHOULD be used by the KDC as
                   -- hints to guide its selection of an appropriate
                   -- certificate chain to return to the client.
          kdcPkId                 [2] IMPLICIT OCTET STRING
                                      OPTIONAL,
                   -- Contains a CMS type SignerIdentifier encoded
                   -- according to [RFC3852].
                   -- Identifies, if present, a particular KDC
                   -- public key that the client already has.
          ...
       }

       DHNonce ::= OCTET STRING

       TrustedCA ::= SEQUENCE {
          caName                  [0] IMPLICIT OCTET STRING,
                   -- Contains a PKIX type Name encoded according to
                   -- [RFC3280].
                   -- Identifies a CA by the CA's distinguished subject
                   -- name.
          certificateSerialNumber [1] INTEGER OPTIONAL,
                   -- Specifies the CA certificate's serial number.
                   -- The defintion of the certificate serial number
                   -- is taken from X.509 [X.509-97].
          subjectKeyIdentifier    [2] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL,
                   -- Identifies the CA's public key by a key
                   -- identifier.  When an X.509 certificate is
                   -- referenced, this key identifier matches the X.509
                   -- subjectKeyIdentifier extension value.  When other
                   -- certificate formats are referenced, the documents
                   -- that specify the certificate format and their use
                   -- with the CMS must include details on matching the
                   -- key identifier to the appropriate certificate
                   -- field.



Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005              [Page 26]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


          ...
       }


       AuthPack ::= SEQUENCE {
          pkAuthenticator         [0] PKAuthenticator,
          clientPublicValue       [1] SubjectPublicKeyInfo OPTIONAL,
                   -- Type SubjectPublicKeyInfo is defined in
                   -- [RFC3280].
                   -- Specifies Diffie-Hellman domain parameters
                   -- and the client's public key value [IEEE1363].
                   -- The DH public key value is encoded as a BIT
                   -- STRING, as specified in Section 2.3.3 of
                   -- [RFC3279].
                   -- This field is present only if the client wishes
                   -- to use the Diffie-Hellman key agreement method.
          supportedCMSTypes       [2] SEQUENCE OF AlgorithmIdentifier
                                      OPTIONAL,
                   -- Type AlgorithmIdentifier is defined in
                   -- [RFC3280].
                   -- List of CMS encryption types supported by the
                   -- client in order of (decreasing) preference.
          clientDHNonce           [3] DHNonce OPTIONAL,
                   -- Present only if the client indicates that it
                   -- wishes to reuse DH keys or to allow the KDC to
                   -- do so.
          ...
       }

       PKAuthenticator ::= SEQUENCE {
          cusec                   [0] INTEGER (0..999999),
          ctime                   [1] KerberosTime,
                   -- cusec and ctime are used as in [CLAR], for replay
                   -- prevention.
          nonce                   [2] INTEGER (0..4294967295),
                   -- Chosen randomly;  This nonce does not need to
                   -- match with the nonce in the KDC-REQ-BODY.
          paChecksum              [3] OCTET STRING,
                   -- Contains the SHA1 checksum, performed over
                   -- KDC-REQ-BODY.
          ...
       }

       TD-TRUSTED-CERTIFIERS ::= SEQUENCE OF TrustedCA
                   -- Identifies a list of CAs trusted by the KDC.
                   -- Each TrustedCA identifies a CA or a CA
                   -- certificate (thereby its public key).




Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005              [Page 27]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


       TD-INVALID-CERTIFICATES ::= SEQUENCE OF OCTET STRING
                   -- Each OCTET STRING contains a CMS type
                   -- IssuerAndSerialNumber encoded according to
                   -- [RFC3852].
                   -- Each IssuerAndSerialNumber identifies a
                   -- certificate (sent by the client) with an invalid
                   -- signature.

       KRB5PrincipalName ::= SEQUENCE {
           realm                   [0] Realm,
           principalName           [1] PrincipalName
       }

       AD-INITIAL-VERIFIED-CAS ::= SEQUENCE OF TrustedCA
                   -- Identifies the certification path based on which
                   -- the client certificate was validated.
                   -- Each TrustedCA identifies a CA or a CA
                   -- certificate (thereby its public key).

       PA-PK-AS-REP ::= CHOICE {
          dhInfo                  [0] DHRepInfo,
                   -- Selected when Diffie-Hellman key exchange is
                   -- used.
          encKeyPack              [1] IMPLICIT OCTET STRING,
                   -- Selected when public key encryption is used.
                   -- Contains a CMS type ContentInfo encoded
                   -- according to [RFC3852].
                   -- The contentType field of the type ContentInfo is
                   -- id-envelopedData (1.2.840.113549.1.7.3).
                   -- The content field is an EnvelopedData.
                   -- The contentType field for the type EnvelopedData
                   -- is id-signedData (1.2.840.113549.1.7.2).
                   -- The eContentType field for the inner type
                   -- SignedData (when unencrypted) is id-pkrkeydata
                   -- (1.2.840.113549.1.7.3) and the eContent field
                   -- contains the DER encoding of the type
                   -- ReplyKeyPack.
                   -- ReplyKeyPack is defined below.
          ...
       }

       DHRepInfo ::= SEQUENCE {
          dhSignedData            [0] IMPLICIT OCTET STRING,
                   -- Contains a CMS type ContentInfo encoded according
                   -- to [RFC3852].
                   -- The contentType field of the type ContentInfo is
                   -- id-signedData (1.2.840.113549.1.7.2), and the
                   -- content field is a SignedData.



Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005              [Page 28]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


                   -- The eContentType field for the type SignedData is
                   -- id-pkdhkeydata (1.3.6.1.5.2.3.2), and the
                   -- eContent field contains the DER encoding of the
                   -- type KDCDHKeyInfo.
                   -- KDCDHKeyInfo is defined below.
          serverDHNonce           [1] DHNonce OPTIONAL
                   -- Present if and only if dhKeyExpiration is
                   -- present.
       }

       KDCDHKeyInfo ::= SEQUENCE {
          subjectPublicKey        [0] BIT STRING,
                   -- KDC's DH public key.
                   -- The DH public key value is encoded as a BIT
                   -- STRING, as specified in Section 2.3.3 of
                   -- [RFC3279].
          nonce                   [1] INTEGER (0..4294967295),
                   -- Contains the nonce in the PKAuthenticator of the
                   -- request if DH keys are NOT reused,
                   -- 0 otherwise.
          dhKeyExpiration         [2] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
                   -- Expiration time for KDC's key pair,
                   -- present if and only if DH keys are reused. If
                   -- this field is omitted then the serverDHNonce
                   -- field MUST also be omitted.
          ...
       }

       ReplyKeyPack ::= SEQUENCE {
          replyKey                [0] EncryptionKey,
                   -- Contains the session key used to encrypt the
                   -- enc-part field in the AS-REP.
          nonce                   [1] INTEGER (0..4294967295),
                   -- Contains the nonce in the PKAuthenticator of the
                   -- request.
          ...
       }

       TD-DH-PARAMETERS ::= SEQUENCE OF AlgorithmIdentifier
                   -- Each AlgorithmIdentifier specifies a set of
                   -- Diffie-Hellman domain parameters [IEEE1363].
                   -- This list is in decreasing preference order.
       END








Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005              [Page 29]

Internet-Draft                   PKINIT                         May 2005


Intellectual Property Statement

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.


Disclaimer of Validity

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.


Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).  This document is subject
   to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
   except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.


Acknowledgment

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.




Tung & Zhu              Expires November 24, 2005              [Page 30]


